The fresh survey contains step 3 parts. Area I integrated concerns away from socio-group studies (years, number of knowledge, parity, familial money, field, most recent marital position, sexual pastime, history of HPV inoculation, and you can reputation for unusual cervical malignant tumors assessment).

Part II made up of 6 questions regarding the target ladies who is screened, age first off, volume, age or requirements to end regarding tests, and techniques out of screening. Just the players that has heard away from HPV would go-ahead so you can Part III and this examined information about HPV of their sort of (oncogenic otherwise low-oncogenic), function off transmission and prevention.

Before the analysis, the latest questionnaire from area II and region III in Thai adaptation was indeed contemplated, chatted about, and you will revised until consensus one of 20 researchers who have been most of the gynecologic oncologists (particular was in fact article writers various other synchronous education). The pros ranked every one of 19 issues since both ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘not relevant’. The thing-level Posts Validity Index (I-CVI) is actually determined each product, and the Articles Authenticity Index (CVI) try calculated by taking the common proportion out of 14 questions relating to information about cervical cancer tumors assessment and you may 5 questions relating to HPV. Brand new CVI was step one both for areas of the latest survey (S1 Table). The brand new reliability is checked in 29 feminine with similar trait given that professionals. The newest Cronbach’ leader https://brightwomen.net/da/ostrigske-kvinder/ coefficients on the reliability was indeed 0.819 to have information about cervical malignant tumors examination and you can 0.907 to have knowledge about HPV.

Analysis collection

On the day out of planned colposcopy, the study assistant considering pointers of your own study for the female whom met addition conditions. The women whom offered to participate gave authored advised consent and you may answered the latest questionnaire individually themselves prior to continuing to help you colposcopy.

Research gathered for it study was indeed socio-demographic research (Part I of your survey), knowledge of cervical disease evaluating (Part II), and experience with HPV (Area III).

Analytical research

The brand new solutions of knowledge regarding cervical malignant tumors evaluating and you may HPV had been assessed from the per item before rating categorization. Right address try obtained because 1 while ‘wrong and being unsure of answer’ was obtained 0.

Regarding 14 questions from cervical cancer tumors screening, female whoever rating were ? 10 was basically arbitrarily classified given that having ‘good knowledge’ usually have been regarded as which have “not good knowledge”. Having experience with HPV, women whose address is ‘never observed HPV’ was in fact omitted throughout the research of HPV education.

Off 5 issues, female whose get was ? step 3 was indeed thought to be with ‘a great experience with HPV’ otherwise because ‘bad knowledge’. Out of 19 issues, feminine whoever rating was ? thirteen had been categorized since which have ‘a great overall knowledge’ otherwise because the ‘not good total knowledge’.

All of the data had been collected inside the an electronic databases and you may reviewed using SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze group studies and was summarized once the amounts having percentage, suggest with fundamental departure otherwise average with range. The brand new association anywhere between for each and every variable and education get was indeed analyzed having fun with easy linear regression. Exploratory design is made when you look at the multivariable study plus all variables potentially connected with the content score. The new felt number of analytical benefit is actually good p-property value 0.05 or less.

Results

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>