Advice, affect, and you will candidate sex in the U

Advice, affect, and you will candidate sex in the U

101 . Newhagen , John Age. , “Beyond self-report: Having fun with latency to answer model issue reacting process to the web-created public opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook to have Political Telecommunications Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you will Lance Holbert , R. ( Nyc : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo Scholar

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John R. , “Political thinking will vary with physiological traits,” Science , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is feminine very likely to vote for ladies factors expenses than simply the men associates?” Legislative Knowledge Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Women Create: The insurance policy Effect of women into the Congress ( Chi town : University away from il Press , 2002 ).Bing Beginner

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you can Hurley , Patricia An excellent. , “Symbolic speeches regarding U.S. Senate in addition to their representational implications,” Journal out of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks show blacks and you may feminine show women? A good contingent ‘yes’,” Record out-of Government 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-relevant governmental training and detailed logo of females,” Governmental Behavior 2003 , 25 : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Student

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be good ‘gender affinity effect’ from inside the American politics? S. Family elections,” Governmental Search Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Student

This information has been quoted because of the following products. So it number is generated centered on study provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A beneficial. and you may Crave, Ellen 2015. Can it be Gender, Religiosity or One another? A job Congruity Idea off Candidate Electability when you look at the beautiful sexy belarusian girls Transformation Tunisia. Point of views with the Government, Vol. 13, Point. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Just who stereotypes feminine individuals? Distinguishing individual variations in feminine stereotype dependency. Politics, Groups, and you may Identities, Vol. step 3, Thing. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The fresh role from gender when you look at the detailed image,” Political Browse Every quarter 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female assault. Politics additionally the Lifetime Sciences, Vol. 34, Procedure. 1, p. 49.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you can Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering mixed signals: brand new role out of gender and partisanship inside analysis off political figures. Diary from Elections, Public-opinion and you can Activities, Vol. twenty-six, Issue. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Which have Cardiovascular system and you may (No) Notice? How Recipients Adversely Infer Shed Information regarding Political leaders and just how It Impacts the fresh Review of Speakermunication Research, Vol. 43, Point. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you will Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Attitudes away from Female People in politics: The case regarding Poland. Politics inside Main Europe, Vol. 14, Point. 3, p. 7.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The effective use of Personal Part Idea towards Study of Gender when you look at the Politics. Political Psychology, Vol. forty, Point. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sun Younger and you can Baek, Younger Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence towards Feminine Political leaders: Why Ambivalence Issues to have Gender Equality in the a Democracy. Diary of women, Government & Plan, Vol. forty, Material. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Murder and Women in Government. Corvinus Journal out of International Activities, Vol. 4, Topic. 1, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leadership from the Media: Gender Prejudice for the Leader Stereotypes through the Venture and you may Routine Times. United kingdom Record away from Governmental Science, Vol. fifty, Situation. 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Citizens Determine Street?Peak Bureaucrats’ Love and Ability? An effective Typology and Test. Societal Administration Opinion, Vol. 80, Point. 4, p. 532.

Lämna ett svar